Timidity here will bespeak canker and atrophy of the soul. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible. The appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is not involved, as it would be if he were choosing his words for himself.
But on the other side, the social bond itself is nothing but the mutual reflection of these self-secure integrities. It is at this point that the special connection between politics and the debasement of language becomes clear.
In the essay, Orwell cited five examples of "the English language as it is now habitually written.
In prose, the worst thing one can do with words is surrender to them. By using stale metaphors, similes, and idioms, you save much mental effort, at the cost of leaving your meaning vague, not only for your reader but for yourself.
Orwell noted the deliberate use of misleading language to hide unpleasant political and military facts and also identified a laxity of language among those he identified as pro-Soviet. It is rather the same thing that is happening to the English language. It follows that any struggle against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes.
Never use a metaphorsimileor other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Words like romantic, plastic, values, human, dead, sentimental, natural, vitality, as used in art criticism, are strictly meaningless, in the sense that they not only do not point to any discoverable object, but are hardly ever expected to do so by the reader.
These save the trouble of picking out appropriate verbs and nouns, and at the same time pad each sentence with extra syllables which give it an appearance of symmetry. The result, in general, is an increase in slovenliness and vagueness. In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing.
I will come back to this presently, and I hope that by that time the meaning of what I have said here will have become clearer. In 5words and meaning have almost parted company. Some metaphors now current have been twisted out of their original meaning without those who use them even being aware of the fact.
Yet without a doubt it is the second kind of sentence that is gaining ground in modern English. The will construct your sentences for you — even think your thoughts for you, to a certain extent — and at need they will perform the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself.
As I have tried to show, modern writing at its worst does not consist in picking out words for the sake of their meaning and inventing images in order to make the meaning clearer.
The political dialects to be found in pamphlets, leading articles, manifestos, White papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, of course, vary from party to party, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, vivid, homemade turn of speech. The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
And this reduced state of consciousness, if not indispensable, is at any rate favourable to political conformity. A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outline and covering up all the details. Animal Farm had been published in August and Orwell was experiencing a time of critical and commercial literary success.
One could keep all of them and still write bad English, but one could not write the kind of stuff that I quoted in those five specimens at the beginning of this article.
Characteristic phrases are render inoperative, militate against, make contact with, be subjected to, give rise to, give grounds for, have the effect of, play a leading part role in, make itself felt, take effect, exhibit a tendency to, serve the purpose of, etc.
Orwell points out that this "translation" contains many more syllables but gives no concrete illustrations, as the original did, nor does it contain any vivid, arresting images or phrases.
The keynote is the elimination of simple verbs. The sole aim of a metaphor is to call up a visual image. Look back through this essay, and for certain you will find that I have again and again committed the very faults I am protesting against.
I am going to translate a passage of good English into modern English of the worst sort. When one watches some tired hack on the platform mechanically repeating the familiar phrases — bestial, atrocities, iron heel, bloodstained tyranny, free peoples of the world, stand shoulder to shoulder — one often has a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy: I will come back to this presently, and I hope that by that time the meaning of what I have said here will have become clearer.
Could I put it more shortly? However, he concluded that the progressive decline of the English language was reversible  and suggested six rules which, he claimed, would prevent many of these faults, although "one could keep all of them and still write bad English". But one can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or a phrase, and one needs rules that one can rely on when instinct fails.Politics and the English Language study guide contains a biography of George Orwell, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
“Politics and the English Language,” though written inremains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and. George Orwell's widely read essay 'Politics and the English Language' links the decline of the English language to the degradation of the political.
George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language,” begins by refuting common presumptions that hold that the decline of the English language is a reflection of the state of society and politics, that this degeneration is inevitable, and that it’s hopeless to resist it.
This. Politics and the English Language, the essay of George Orwell. First published: April by/in Horizon, GB, London. Politics and the English Language - UW Faculty Web Server.Download